Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors


Charles Kulch Investigation into Alleged Over-Concentration of Non-Traded Real Estate Investment Trusts and Variable Annuities

Charles Kulch Investigation into Alleged Over-Concentration of Non-Traded Real Estate Investment Trusts and Variable AnnuitiesThe Goldman Scarlato & Penny PC law firm attorneys are currently investigating Charles Kulch (also known as Charles Chester Kulch) on allegations of over-concentrating customers in illiquid, risky, and high commission products including non-traded real estate investment trusts and variable annuities according to an administrative complaint filed by the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Investors who would like to learn more about the  Charles Kulch investigation are encouraged to contact investor rights attorney Alan Rosca or one of his colleagues for a free case evaluation and discussion of potential options, or to provide any useful information. Call 888-998-0530, via email at, or through the contact form on this webpage.

Charles Kulch Under Investigation by the Massachusetts Securities Division

In June 2017, the Massachusetts Securities Division began an investigation into Next Financial Group and broker Charles Kulch in connection to a phone call from a Massachusetts retiree investor alleging he did not fully understand the nature of the alternative investments sold to him by Kulch, as stated in the administrative complaint.

Allegedly, Kulch recommended and sold hundreds of non-traded REITs to Massachusetts investors for nearly ten years. The complaint further alleges that many of the sales were unsuitable and exceeded Next Financials’ liquid net worth concentration.

Between 2010 and 2015, Kulch allegedly processed more than 300 REIT purchases in the accounts of over 160 Massachusetts customers in addition to allegedly processing at least 51 non-traded REIT transactions, according to the complaint.

In addition, Next Financial Group allegedly processed multiple simultaneous transactions for 48 of the 51 non-traded REIT transactions in a customer’s account without accounting for the reduction to the customer’s liquid net worth that occurred for each transaction, the complaint states.

As alleged in the complaint, Kulch and Next Financial incorrectly calculated the percentage of a customer’s liquid net worth that each non-traded REIT purchase represented.

As a result of the alleged misconduct, Next Financial was fined $425,000 for failure to supervise the sales of REITs.

In addition, in 2011 the New Hampshire Division ordered Charles Chester Kulch to cease and desist and pay a fine of $140,000 for failure to supervise the dissemination of seminar invitations containing inaccurate information.

Next Financial broker Charles Kulch was registered with the firm since October 2006 and remained there until June 2020, as reported on his Brokercheck page.

Charles Kulch Paid Nearly $1 Million in Settlements to Customers

Between July 2006 and September 2020, Kulch paid investors nearly $1 million in settlements according to his FINRA Brokercheck page.

A customer alleging unsuitable nontraded REITs received a $14,999 settlement in September 2020. In May 2016, a customer alleging poor performance was issued a settlement to the tune of $120,000.

Another customer was issued a settlement in May 2016 on allegations of unsuitability and breach of fiduciary duty, among other things. The customer received a settlement to the tune of $525,000.

Similarly, in April 2016, a customer alleging unsuitable recommendations, among other things, received a settlement of $150,000.

A customer who filed a dispute alleging market losses and suitability, received a settlement to the tune of $100,000 in July 2006.

Charles Kulch has multiple pending customer disputes on his Brokercheck page alleging unsuitable recommendations of registered, non-traded real estate investment funds. The four disputes were reportedly filed between August 2020 and December 2020 and all four disputes seek unspecified compensatory damages determined by NEXT Financial to be at least $5,000 for the alleged conduct. As of the date of this article, all four disputes show as pending.

Finally, it is important to note that, as of the date of this article, there has not been a finding of liability as to the complaints or allegations mentioned in this article, unless otherwise indicated. Any reader should also read the original sources hyperlinked in this blog for accuracy, including any BrokerCheck report and/or record of any disciplinary or regulatory action. Those sources are incorporated by reference into the text of this blog, and are the governing materials in case of any inconsistencies or typos in this blog.

Concerned About Your Investment with broker Charles Kulch?

Contact us

    Potential Options for Charles Kulch Investors

    The Goldman Scarlato & Penny PC law firm represents investors who lose money as a result of investment-related fraud or broker misconduct and is currently investigating conduct related to Charles Kulch’s alleged over-concentration of non-traded real estate investment trusts and variable annuities.

    The firm takes most cases of this type on a contingency fee basis and advances the case costs, and only gets paid for their fees and costs out of any money recovered for clients. Attorney Alan Rosca, a securities lawyer and adjunct professor of securities regulation, has represented thousands of victimized investors across the country and around the world in cases ranging from arbitrations to class actions.

    Investors who are concerned they may have suffered a loss with Charles Kulch may contact attorney Alan Rosca for a free no-obligation evaluation of their recovery options, at 888-998-0530, via email at, or through the contact form on this webpage.

    In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent updates regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases. Also, the brokercheck report linked to some of our blogs is the up-to-date version as of the date of accessing. Visitors may check the most recent version of each brokercheck report at

    Leave a Reply