Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors


The Problems with Certain Bard/Davol Mesh Implants

C.R. Bard, Inc. (Davol) is a worldwide leader in the $600 million-dollar hernia mesh industry. They maintain one of the broadest and deepest product lines in the industry and they are a major profit source for the company making up 17% of its net total sales. Much of their market share success is the result of their innovative marketing programs that consist of surgeon training and patient education and awareness.

Many of Bard’s products use heavyweight mesh combined with Polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). The intended goal of heavyweight mesh is to achieve maximum stability by closing the defect with a stiff device that maximizes scar tissue. However, physiologically the mechanical stability of heavyweight mesh it too high, exceeding that of the abdominal wall. Consequently, it results in fibrosis and leads to stiffening of the implant as oppose to increased mechanical stability. This, along with its smaller pore size causes a greater inflammatory response and exposes patients to unnecessary risks, such as greater scar tissue formation, decreased graft compliance, decreased tissue incorporation, increased graft shrinkage and increased pain and discomfort. Some animal studies have found the graft shrinkage with this type of heavyweight mesh to be greater than 50%.

Additionally, the type of polypropylene mesh that Bard uses is not intended for medical application. Different companies supply polypropylene material that is used in hernia mesh implants. Bard gets its polypropylene from the Phillips Sumika Polypropylene Company. Phillips Sumika provides a medical application caution along with its polypropylene. It specifically warns against using its material in medical applications involving permanent implantation in the human body or permanent contact with internal bodily fluids or tissues. The Phillips Sumika safety data sheet states that its polypropylene material should not be used in human implants unless it has been provided directly form the company under an agreement which expressly acknowledges such contemplated use.

In addition to being made from these harmful materials, a number of Bard implants are accompanied with specific selling features that can be harmful. For instance, Bard Kugel patches, which were FDA cleared in 2002, have memory coil rings that allow the patch to be folded and inserted through a small abdominal incision and, once in place, they spring open helping the mesh lay flat over the affected area. However, this design has been associated with many problems such as the rings buckling and rupturing. Shrinkage and migration of this mesh is also a common problem that has been reported. Another poorly designed Bard product is their Composix E/X and Composix mesh. This implant consists of two distinct sides, one that is polypropylene (PP) and the other that is ePTFE. This product is associated with a high rate of adhesions for several reasons. One, the heavy weighted PP induces a large inflammatory process that leads to fibrosis. Further, this mesh cannot be cut without widely exposing the PP layer. In addition, the holes in the ePTFE side of the mesh made by the stiches create adhesions. Bard’s Ventralex product, which was also cleared by the FDA in 2002, has similar design problems as described with its Composix products. The heavyweight PP and the ePTFE are mismatched materials because they contract at different rates making them mechanically incompatible. All of these design flaws lead to further complications and often times require the patient to undergo additional surgeries.

Goldman, Scarlato & Penny are investigating the following Bard/Davol mesh products:

  • Composix Kugel Mesh
  •  Ventralex Mesh
  •  ST products (Sepramesh)
  •  Composix E/X Mesh
  •  3DMax
  •  Visilex
  •  Spermatix
  •  Perfix Plug

Protect Your Rights

If you or a loved one have suffered from pain, infection, organ damage or hernia reoccurrence leading to subsequent surgery you may be entitled to compensation. Please contact us today.

There are time limits by which you need to file a product liability lawsuit. Those limits could time bar your case if it is not filed in a timely manner.

Contact Us

Complete the Free Case Review form and one of our attorneys will reach out to you within 24 hours to conduct a free and confidential evaluation of your case.

In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent updates regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases. Also, the brokercheck report linked to some of our blogs is the up-to-date version as of the date of accessing. Visitors may check the most recent version of each brokercheck report at

Leave a Reply