Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors


Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Price-Fixing Regarding Platinum and Palladium

Platinum and Palladium Class Action filed by Goldman Scarlato & Penny, P.C.

A complaint filed Friday in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleges price manipulation in the markets for platinum and palladium products.  Platinum and palladium are primarily found in the production of catalytic converters for automobiles and in jewelry.

Goldman Scarlato & Penny filed the nationwide class action on behalf of persons who 1) traded or held physical platinum or palladium, or 2) platinum or palladium derivative products that were settled or marked-to-market at the Platinum and Palladium Fixings benchmark, or 3) NYMEX platinum and palladium futures and options contracts.

The named defendants are BASF Metals Limited, a subsidiary of BASF; Goldman Sachs International, a subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.; HSBC Bank USA, N.A., a subsidiary of HSBC Holdings Plc; and, Standard Bank Plc, a subsidiary of Standard Bank Group Limited.

The Plaintiff’s class action complaint alleges the defendants conspired to manipulate and rig the global benchmarks for physical platinum and palladium prices, the “Platinum and Palladium Fixings,” and the prices of platinum-based and palladium-based financial derivative products.  The alleged collusion began in 2007, nearly eight years ago.

According to the class action complaint, “(t)he Platinum and Palladium Fixings are set via teleconference twice a day, and the only participants during these teleconferences are Defendants BASF, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, and Standard Bank.  Through this process, the prices for the global physical platinum and palladium markets are set or ‘fixed,’ which in turn, directly impacts the prices of platinum- and palladium-based financial products, like platinum and palladium futures and options, because these instruments are inextricably linked to the prices of the physical platinum and palladium underlying these derivatives contracts.”

A U.K. company headquartered in London, England, The London Platinum and Palladium Fixing Company Ltd. (“LPPFC”) was identified in the complaint as an agent or co-conspirator but was not named as a defendant.  According to the complaint, LPPFC administered and published the Platinum and Palladium Fixings.  On October 16, 2014, the LPPFC removed itself from its responsibilities of administering the Platinum and Palladium Fixings and appointed the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) as the new administrator of the supposedly revamped global price-setting process for platinum and palladium.

The complaint alleges that the defendants and their co-conspirators were privy to and shared confidential, nonpublic information about client purchase and sale orders that allowed them to glean information about the direction of platinum and palladium prices, and consequently, gave them the ability to execute trades in physical platinum and palladium and platinum- and palladium-based financial products in advance of those movements.

Members of the Class transacted in physical platinum and palladium and/or platinum- and palladium-based financial products, including platinum and palladium futures and options traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”).  Plaintiff and members of the Class lost value on tens of thousands of transactions involving physical platinum and palladium and platinum- and palladium- based financial products because of Defendants’ unlawful conduct.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (are currently investigating manipulation of gold prices, which, like platinum and palladium, are set daily in a similar process.

In light of increased regulatory scrutiny of precious metals markets and commodity-related benchmarks generally, the Platinum and Palladium Fixings have recently undergone a significant overhaul.  The price-setting process for platinum and palladium supposedly has been revamped, including replacing the LPPFC  with the LME to run the new pricing system for physical platinum and palladium.  However, those changes came too late for Plaintiff and members of the proposed class.

About Goldman Scarlato & Penny, P.C.

Goldman Scarlato & Penny, P.C. prosecutes antitrust class actions and represents consumers and small businesses pursing price-fixing claims and claims of anti-competitive conduct.  To learn more about Goldman Scarlato & Penny, P.C., please visit our website at or contact Paul Scarlato, or Mark Goldman,

In our legal system, every person is innocent until and unless found guilty by a court of law or a tribunal. Whenever we reference “allegations” or charges that are “alleged,” such allegations or charges have not been proven, and are merely accusations, not findings of fault, as of the date of the blog. We do not have, nor do we undertake, a duty to continue to monitor or follow cases about which we report, and/or to publish subsequent updates regarding various developments that may occur in such cases. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research regarding any such cases and any developments that may or may not have occurred in such cases. Also, the brokercheck report linked to some of our blogs is the up-to-date version as of the date of accessing. Visitors may check the most recent version of each brokercheck report at

Leave a Reply